Prop Firm Directory.

See the full picture. Find a firm that fits the way you trade.

36 prop firms
23 source pass rates23 source risk assessments36 firm profiles
Compare 36 prop firms
#PROP FIRMPASS RATEHIDDEN RISKCOUNTRYFOUNDEDMARKETSOFFER / CODEEXPLORE
01
FundedNext
4.5Trustpilot*
10%Estimate
ModerateAE flagAE2022
ForexCryptoFutures
5%
Review
02
FTMO
4.8Trustpilot*
10%Reported
LowCZ flagCZ2015
FXMetalsIndicesEnergyCryptoStocks
Review
03
AquaFunded
3.8Trustpilot*
8%Estimate
Very highAE flagAE2023
ForexIndicesCommoditiesCryptoFutures
Review
04
Funding Pips
4.5Trustpilot*
10%Estimate
HighAE flagAE2022
ForexIndicesCrypto
Review
05
Top One Trader
4.5Trustpilot*
10%Estimate
ModerateUS flagUS2023
ForexMetalsIndicesCrypto
Review
06
The5ers
4.7Trustpilot*
9%Estimate
LowIL flagIL2016
ForexMetalsCrypto
Review
07
FunderPro
3.9Trustpilot*
7.3%Reported
Very highMT flagMT2023
ForexCryptoIndices
Review
08
Instant Funding
4.5Trustpilot*
19.3%Community*
Very highGB flagGB2021
ForexIndicesCrypto
Review
09
For Traders
4.0Trustpilot*
8%Estimate
HighAE flagAE2023
ForexCryptoFutures
Review
10
Funding Traders
4.5Trustpilot*
19.3%Community*
LowAE flagAE2023
ForexIndicesCommoditiesCrypto
Review

* Trustpilot scores and offers sourced from PropFirmEdge on 10/15/2026. Trustpilot data and offers are reference values. Initial assessment labels are attributed to PropFirmGrades; Reported and Estimate retain that publisher’s labels.

*Community pass rates come from PropTradingArea trader feedback, not audited provider-wide results. Risk labels are publisher opinions. Open each metric for its source; methods and account models differ.

Your shortlist. Side by side.

Choose 2–3 firms to compare costs, platforms, trading rules and payouts.

Open comparison
01Choose a firm
02Choose a firm
03Optional third firm

Best prop firms for…

Find a shortlist for the way you trade.

How prop firm grades work

One letter gives a quick overview of the comparison source’s assessment. Read it alongside the account rules, pass-rate basis, and original review.

20 profiles currently have an attributed source grade.

Read the method
A

Excellent

The strongest band in the source’s overall assessment.

B

Good

A positive assessment, with individual account terms still worth checking.

C

Average

A mixed assessment: compare the strengths and restrictions carefully.

D

Weak

A lower assessment that calls for closer review of the source’s concerns.

E

Poor

The lowest band; read the publisher’s supporting analysis before deciding.

Frequently asked questions

Which prop firm is the best right now?

There is no single best firm for every trading style. Compare markets, platforms, account rules, and costs. FundedNext and FTMO are pinned first by the site’s display preference; that position is not a claim that they have the highest source grade.

What do the grades A to E mean?

They are source assessment bands, from A (the strongest) to E (the weakest). We attribute imported grades to PropFirmGrades and do not claim to have calculated its scores. The methodology page explains how to read them alongside the original review.

Where do your pass rates come from?

Available pass rates are imported from PropFirmGrades and retain its Reported, Estimate, or Third-party label. A source estimate is not a measured success rate or a prediction of your results. Firms without a matching source remain unfilled.

What is hidden risk?

This is the assessment publisher’s label for less obvious account restrictions, such as consistency requirements, trading permissions, or payout conditions. It is a source opinion, not a guarantee about an account or company.

Do I need an account?

No account is needed to browse firms, read articles, or compare the directory. Favorites are saved in your browser. Account purchases and provider sign-in happen on the firm’s own website.

Blog & market insights. Fresh perspectives.

A closer look at the stories shaping crypto and trading.

All articles
Crypto & Markets

Bitcoin’s quantum migration debate

A proposal about dormant Bitcoin raises questions about how a future cryptographic upgrade could treat coins that are never moved.

Trader voices. Every perspective matters.

The details traders look for, and the experiences they share.

Alex Morgan

Illustrative review

Compare the rules first

I would start with the drawdown rules, payout schedule and platform. Seeing those details together makes it easier to build a shortlist that fits a trading plan.

Jamie Chen

Illustrative review

The small details matter

A low entry fee is only one part of the comparison. I also want to understand how daily losses are calculated, what a qualifying trading day means and which conditions apply to a payout.

Sam Taylor

Illustrative review

A more useful shortlist

My first checks would be platform availability and the markets I trade. From there, I would read the exact challenge rules before choosing an account size.

Jordan Lee

Illustrative review

Read beyond the headline

A large allocation sounds attractive, but I would compare the actual loss allowance and reward conditions before making a decision.

Casey Wilson

Illustrative review

Match the programme to the strategy

Weekend holding and news restrictions would be high on my checklist. A programme needs to work with the way I already trade, rather than encourage me to change my approach just to pass an evaluation.

Riley Davis

Illustrative review

Keep the comparison clear

I would save a few candidates and compare their rules side by side. It is much easier to spot differences when the same information is shown for each firm.

Morgan Blake

Illustrative review

Costs deserve a closer look

Before buying a challenge, I would check commissions, the checkout currency and refund conditions. The starting price does not always explain the total cost.

Avery Parker

Illustrative review

Check the source

I would use a comparison page for research, then confirm the latest conditions on the provider’s website. Knowing where the figures came from helps with that final check.

Taylor Reed

Illustrative review

Payout rules come first

The profit split matters, but so do eligible days, withdrawal methods and payout timing. Those are the details I would want to understand before getting started.

Cameron Ellis

Illustrative review

Choose with a plan

My shortlist would be based on clear rules and a realistic trading routine. I would rather take time to compare a few suitable programmes than pick the largest account straight away.

Quinn Harper

Illustrative review

Keep risk in perspective

I would compare the daily and overall loss limits before looking at account size. Clear risk rules help me decide whether a programme fits the way I manage each trade.

Drew Bennett

Illustrative review

Find a platform that fits

The platform would be one of my first checks. I want familiar order controls, the instruments I trade and a clear view of fees before committing to an evaluation.

Robin Hayes

Illustrative review

Make room for consistency

I would look for rules that fit a steady trading routine. Understanding minimum trading days and consistency requirements makes it easier to plan without rushing a decision.

Skyler Brooks

Illustrative review

Understand the payout process

Before choosing a firm, I would read how payout requests work, which methods are supported and when a first withdrawal becomes eligible. Those practical details matter to my comparison.

Reese Carter

Illustrative review

Take time with the shortlist

I would keep a small list of suitable firms, revisit their current terms and compare the total challenge cost. A little more research helps me choose with a clearer plan.